The Genetic Genealogist

Nature has a brand new web focus on personal genomics (as of November 5th, 2008).  And best of all, most of the articles are entirely free to access, download, and read!  From the site:

“As the number of human beings with their genomes fully sequenced ticks higher and direct-to-consumer gene profiling companies push the limits of what medical genetics can do, the once fantastical notion that any given human can walk into a doctor’s office with his or her genome on a hard drive looks more and more like a reality. Still the question remains to be answered: how do we use this wealth information? In this Nature web focus we proudly present the challenges this approaching reality poses for technology, the legal and ethical confines of research, and the ability of genomics to translate into clinical utility.”

Here are just a few of the interesting news & opinion articles:

• My genome. So what?
• How to get the most from a gene test
• Personal Genomes: When consent gets in the way
• Personal genomes: Misdirected precaution
• Personal genomes: The case of the missing heritability
• Personal genomes: A disruptive personality, disrupted

And unlike other bloggers who will undoubtedly mention these articles, I recommend that you read or peruse all the articles, not just the ones I happen to agree with!

In addition to the articles, Nature has a podcast (mp3) of special features on personal human genomes.  And lastly, follow along as Nature blogs from the 58th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Human Genetics in Philadelphia from November 11-15.  It looks like this is going to be quite a meeting.

HT: tweet from attilacsordas – are you tweeting yet?  Join me there.

Image via Wikipedia

Ötzi the Iceman is the popular name for a 5,000 year-old mummy discovered frozen in the ice of the Alps in 1991.  Studies of the Iceman has revealed an immense amount of information about him, including details of his life, his death, and his culture. 

Although Ötzi’s mtDNA has previously been studied, researchers had only examined short segments which suggested that his mtDNA belonged to Haplogroup K.  A new paper in Current Biology (subscription only darn it) details Ötzi’s full mtDNA genome for the first time:

"Using a mixed sequencing procedure based on PCR amplification and 454 sequencing of pooled amplification products, we have retrieved the first complete mitochondrial-genome sequence of a prehistoric European. We have then compared it with 115 related extant lineages from mitochondrial haplogroup K. We found that the Iceman belonged to a branch of mitochondrial haplogroup K1 that has not yet been identified in modern European populations."

The full sequence (which has been deposited in GenBank with accession number EU810403) was then compared to 115 published full mtDNA Haplogroup K sequences.  The comparison suggests that Ötzi belonged to a previously uncharacterized subclade of Haplogroup K, now termed K1ö.

Strange Conclusions – Otzi has NO living relatives?

Now, as any genetic genealogist knows, when your mtDNA doesn’t match anyone you conclude that you have to wait until more people get tested.  This is especially true if you believe that your relatives would be in continental Europe – for some reason those continental Europeans have very little interest in genetic genealogy.  The authors point out that Ötzi’s mtDNA line might have died out in the past 5,000 years, but they also acknowledge that the comparison database was small and further testing in Europe might reveal more examples of this new subclade.

As Kambiz points out in the comments to his post on this new paper, the media isn’t quite as careful as the authors of the paper.  See "Iceman May Have No Living Relatives" by National Geographic, for example.  Although they do a decent job of discussing the article and all the aspects I mention, the title is so bad that it makes my teeth hurt.

Or Does he?

But see this article: "DNA shows Otzi the Iceman has kin."  According to the article, Alan Cooper – head of the University of Adelaide’s Australian Center for Ancient DNA – has also sequenced Otzi’s mtDNA and stated that "We have found someone very, very closely related."  I’m looking forward to comparing the mtDNA genome obtained by the two research groups.  Will they be the same?

A few points to remember:

• Ötzi’s mtDNA belongs to a previously undiscovered subclade of Haplogroup K, but there is currently no data to suggest that this subclade has died out in present-day humans.  115 mtDNA genomes barely constitutes a database!
• Remember that this is only mtDNA testing, which passes only from mother to child.  Even if there is no living person with mtDNA belonging to the K1ö subclade, Ötzi could still have 2 billion direct descendants!

The Paper:  Luca Ermini, Cristina Olivieri, Ermanno Rizzi, Giorgio Corti, Raoul Bonnal, Pedro Soares, Stefania Luciani, Isolina Marota, Gianluca De Bellis, Martin B. Richards, Franco Rollo (2008). “Complete Mitochondrial Genome Sequence of the Tyrolean Iceman” Current Biology, DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.09.028.

HT: Anthropology.net.

(Jim Watson via Wikipedia)

As if there wasn’t enough to worry about during the genetic revolution, researchers have found a way to characterize redacted genetic sequences from whole-genome or large-scale sequencing.

Here’s how it works.  Let’s say that Mr. X has had his genome sequenced, but doesn’t want to know the results of some genes known to influence the development or progression of Alzheimer’s Disease.  So when he receives his genomic sequencing, these genes have been ‘redacted’, or removed from the data.  This is exactly what James Watson decided to do when he received his data.

Characterizing Redacted Genes

However, researchers have characterized one of Watson’s redacted genes by examining the sequences surrounding the gene in question.  Often, when we inherit a gene from our patents, we receive that gene as well as some of the surrounding genetic sequence.  By examining the surrounding sequence, some insight into the redacted gene is gained.  For example, if I gave you the quote “A penny _____ is a penny earned”, you can derive from the surrounding words that the missing word is “saved.”

From an article discussing the researcher’s work:

“When the researchers told Watson about the paper’s results prior to publication, he redacted an additional 2 million DNA letters surrounding his APOE gene. This will make determining his redacted sequences much more difficult to decode – but not impossible, the authors write.”

Ethical Concerns

This ability, of course, raises numerous ethical concerns.  If we value the protection of privacy, even for people who make part of their genetic sequence available online, how do we protect their privacy?  Asking people to avoid this type of analysis won’t work, of course.  Is the only answer to redact huge portions of DNA surrounding redacted genes?  Or are we faced with an all-or-nothing question: either people put their entire sequence online (or just portions but face the risk of this analysis) or they keep their sequence private?

The authors of the study are also concerned about the potential problems.  From the paper:

“We believe the potential for such indirect estimation of genetic risk has considerable relevance to concerns about privacy, confidentiality, discriminatory and defamatory use of genetic data, and the complexities of informed consent for both research participants and their close genetic relatives in the era of personalized genomics.”

For more discussion, see the always-great Genetic Future.  See also “DNA detectives can decode ‘censored’ genomes” in New Scientist.

The article: Dale R Nyholt, Chang-En Yu, Peter M Visscher (2008). On Jim Watson’s APOE Status: Genetic Information is Hard to Hide. European J. of Human Genetics (DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.198).

Image via Wikipedia

This week I was quoted in the November issue of Wired Magazine about the use of autosomal DNA for genetic genealogy testing.

A Controversy

At “Adoptees use DNA to find surname,” Larry Moran at Sandwalk comments on my recent articles (here, here, and here) regarding the use of genetic genealogy (or genetic sequencing in general) test results to find unknown biological parents.  Although Dr. Moran accuses me of being a “cheerleader” who is blind to any ethical concerns associated with using DNA to find biological parents, he obviously didn’t do his research!  Less than a month ago I wrote this on the blog:

“For most people, being able to identify your own ancestors based on your own DNA poses few if any ethical dilemmas. However, what if your neighbor or your stalker or even law enforcement wants to use a sample of your DNA to identify your ancestors? Additionally, what if your living ancestor doesn’t wish to be identified? Does the ancestor have that right, or is possible identification through genetic genealogy just one of the consequences of parenting a child anonymously or simply having sex with another person?”

In response to a write-up at Genome Technology, Discovering Biology in a Digital World wrote “Hey sperm donors, could DNA testing be hazardous to your wealth?“.

Blending Genetic Genealogy and Personal Genomics

Often, articles that discuss both genetic genealogy and whole-genome scans (like those offered by deCODEme and 23andMe) blur the different services together and completely confuse the reader (usually because the author is confused!).  However, in “Will Technology Cure Health Care — Or Kill It?,” journalist Alistair Croll does a good job:

“Testing can get as low as $60, as Familybuilder recently showed. Founded in 2007, the company received a $1.5M Series A funding from DN Capital in February 2008. While the company only analyzes enough DNA to trace genealogy, it stores the raw samples for two years, so CEO Ilya Nikolayev hasn’t ruled out the possibility of selling additional analysis to customers in future.”

Russ Altman, a scientific advisor for 23andMe, recently wrote a blog post about his first “post-genomic moment.”  After reading an article about the possible association between a SNP and muscle breakdown due to statins, Altman logged into his 23andMe account and examined his read at that SNP.  There’s also a post about Altman’s experience at The Spittoon, 23andMe’s corporate blog.

The Personal Genome Project

The “First 10,” the first 10 participants in the Personal Genome Project, met on Monday the 20th to review the results of their genetic sequencing.  For more information, see a blog post by participant Misha Angrist, and Jason Bobe has a great round-up of articles at “Press coverage on the Personal Genome Project’s 2nd annual meeting at Harvard Medical School.”

Family Tree DNA Automates

Family Tree DNA is using new automated technology to manage their samples.  For more info, see “Family Tree DNA automates sample management” and “Geneology Testing Firm Adopts Tecan Sample-Management Systems” (but ignore the glaring spelling error!).

Image by gravitywave via Flickr

Last week I wrote about using genetic genealogy databases to identify someone’s surname (see “DNA Could Reveal Your Surname, Of Course.”)  The article discussed results from researcher Dr. Turi King which suggested that there is a 24% to 50% chance that two men who share the same surname share a common ancestor through that name, with chances increasing if the surname is rare.

Somehow I completely missed “Adoptees use DNA to find surname“, an article at BBC News this June.  Men who were adopted as children are using genetic genealogy databases in an attempt to identify their biological surname.  This is Dr. King’s research in motion.  Family Tree DNA, for example, has a project for Adopted people that is over 2 years old, and has a success rate of more than 30%, thanks in large part to their database of over 130,000 records.  From Bennett Greenspan:

“We now have a growing number of people who are adopted, who have tested with us and have matched several individuals with a particular surname, and maybe they haven’t matched anyone else with a different surname. From that, they can get the idea that they have at least found the surname they need to start looking for in the town in which they were born.”

The BBC article ends with Mark Jobling predicting what will happen in the future as technology opens doors for adopted individuals, stating that “tests offering better resolution on the whole genome should be able to solve other familial puzzles.”

Image via Wikipedia

New research from Mark Jobling’s lab at the University of Leicester suggests that Y-DNA can be used to determine a male’s surname.

I know, I know, this is obvious to anyone who is familiar with genetic genealogy.  Just check out the many instances of this type of determination at ISOGG’s Success Stories website, for example.  However, as you’ll see below, this research has resulted in some new and interesting information.

Method

Dr. Turi King, who conducted the research, recruited over 2,500 men with roughly 500 different surnames to submit Y-DNA samples.  The sample set included a group not sharing surnames as well as sets of men (between 2 and 180) who shared a surname (including recognized variants).  She then typed 9 SNPs and 17 STRs.  There’s much more information about this research at the Jobling lab’s website regarding this project.

Results

Although this research may seem obvious, what makes it interesting are the actual statistics.  According to Dr. King’s research, there is a 24% chance that two men who share the same surname share a common ancestor through that name, and this increases to nearly 50% if the surname they share is rare. Keep in mind, of course, that this study was conducted solely in the U.K., so it is unclear how it applies to other countries.  From the press release:

“Dr King then went on to look at 40 surnames in depth by recruiting many different men all bearing the same surname, making sure that she excluded known relatives. Surnames such as Attenborough and Swindlehurst showed that over 70% of the men shared the same or near identical Y chromosome types whereas surnames such as Revis, Wadsworth and Jefferson show more than one group of men sharing common ancestry but unrelated to other groups.”

Implications

The implications of Dr. King’s research have strong significance for genetic genealogists, but the press release focused only on forensic science, stating that “the fact that such a strong link exists between surname and Y chromosome type has a potential use in forensic science, since it suggests that, given large databases of names and Y chromosome profiles, surname prediction from DNA alone may be feasible.”

For more analysis, see Anthropology.net.

I just finished reading an article by Alondra Nelson in the journal Social Studies of Science entitled “Bio Science: Genetic Genealogy Testing and the Pursuit of African Ancestry” (Social Studies of Science 2008 38: 759-783).  Dr. Nelson is Assistant Professor of Sociology, African American Studies and American Studies at Yale University.

This very interesting and insightful article aligns with my own premise, which I’ve stated previously, that receiving the results of a genetic genealogy test is only the beginning of the journey for any individual interested in their own identity or genealogy.

Based on her research in this area, Dr. Nelson writes about the complex interpretation of the results of genetic genealogy testing by African-Americans and black British.  Rather than completely altering their preconceived biographical narratives based on the results of testing, many people struggle to mesh genetic results with these narratives.  From the abstract:

“While there is some acquiescence to genetic thinking about ancestry, and by implication, ‘race’, among African-American and black British consumers of genetic genealogy testing, test-takers also adjudicate between sources of genealogical information and from these construct meaningful biographical narratives. Consumers engage in highly situated ‘objective’ and ‘affiliative’ self-fashioning, interpreting genetic test results in the context of their ‘genealogical aspirations’. I conclude that issues of site, scale, and subjectification must be attended to if scholars are to understand whether and to what extent social identities are being transformed by recent developments in genetic science.”

Nelson goes on to provide a deeper view into how some consumers of genetic genealogy “exercise some control over the interpretation of their test results” to formulate their own narrative “despite the presumption of [the tests'] conclusiveness”:

“My research shows that…the scientific data supplied through genetic genealogy are not always accepted as definitive proof of identity; test results are valuable to ‘root-seekers’ to the extent that they can be deployed in the construction of their individual and collective biographies. Root-seekers align bios (life) and bios (life narratives, life histories) in ways that are meaningful to them.  These users of genetic genealogy interpret and employ their test results in the context of personal experience and the historically shaped politics of identity. They actively draw together and evaluate many sources of genealogical information (genetic and otherwise) and from these weave their own ancestry narratives [footnotes and references omitted].”

I agree with Dr. Nelson’s assessment because I’ve seen it happen numerous times myself.  And, for at least two reasons, even the scientist in me finds support for why people might interpret their results personally: first, the results of a genetic genealogy test do not define me, since I am more than my DNA.  Second, genetic genealogy is still a young and rapidly developing field of science.

What do you think?  Should genetic genealogy consumers accept the results as definitive, or are they subject to personal interpretation?

“Genealogical Disorientation”

As part of the analysis, Dr. Nelson describes the effect testing can have on some individuals, in which “the receipt of genetic facts about ancestry open[] up new questions about identity and belonging, rather than settling them absolutely,”  and can create a “lack of orientation.”  She terms this effect “genealogical disorientation.”  I think this is a terrific term, and is undoubtedly one of the possible side-effects of genetic genealogy.

In fact, I have personally experienced my own genealogical disorientation, although it was minor compared to others.  My Y-DNA test revealed an anomaly found in only a tiny fraction of males – all of whom from England – and which had never been identified in Germany (where my ancestor was supposed to have originated).  This led me to wonder if there had been an NPE (non-paternal event) in my line and thus that my surname was possibly incorrect.  However, since I received my results others with nearby German origins have been shown to possess this particular anomaly, and thus my genealogical disorientation has subsided.

Where you disoriented when you first discovered your results?

Conclusions

So does the possibility of personal interpretation or genealogical disorientation mean that genetic genealogy is dangerous or unwarranted?  My answer to that question, perhaps unsurprisingly, is a resounding no.  It means that scientists, genetic genealogists, and testing companies must be aware of these possibilities and must continue to educate and support individuals who are interested in genetic genealogy testing.

The American Society of Human Genetics is having its 58th Annual Meeting in November.  As I was looking through the meeting abstracts, I noticed that there were a number of abstracts that dealt with topics related to genetic genealogy.  I thought some of you would be interested in getting an advance look at genetic genealogy research that will be publicly released and published over the next year or two.  Although I didn’t include the whole abstracts for most of them, I did include a link for further investigation.  (Note: I got this idea from Dienekes’ Anthropology Blog).

Interestingly, the first five abstracts all include researchers from the Sorenson Molecular Genealogy Foundation, showing how much the Foundation is providing to the genetic genealogy community.

Also very interesting is the final abstract which argues that genetic genealogy, in combination with large-scale genomic analyses, will result in reduced privacy.

“By contributing samples and information to repositories specializing in genetic genealogy, individuals make important contributions to our collective knowledge, but they do so at the risk of revealing personal information shared by unwitting relatives.”

Allocation of YSTR Microvariant Alleles to Y-Chromosome Binary Haplogroups. A. L. Pollock, K. Ritchie, P. A. Underhill, A. A. Lin, S. R. Woodward, U. A. Perego, N. M. Myres

“To identify YSTR microvariant alleles potentially useful for elucidating further phylogenetic substructure within binary haplogroups, we have assessed the haplogroup affiliation of microvariant alleles found at informative frequencies in public YSTR databases for the following YSTR loci: DYS385, DYS392, DYS441, DYS446, DYS447, DYS449 and DYS464. We report haplogroup affiliations for each variant allele and geographic origins of representative samples.” Read more here…

L1c2a, the (African) Haplogroup With The Longest Mitochondrial Genome! K. Ritchie, U. A. Perego, A. Achilli, N. Angerhofer, N. M. Myres, A. Torroni, S. R. Woodward

“During a recent survey of the nearly 58000 mtDNA control region haplotypes currently present in the publicly accessible Sorenson Molecular Genealogy Foundation database, we observed a small number of mtDNAs (n=16) characterized by the presence of unusually long insertions of up to 200 bases. A small subset of these particularly long mtDNA haplotypes shared an identical insertion of 15 bases.” Read more here…

The mitochondrial DNA landscape of modern Mexico. A. Achilli, U. A. Perego, J. E. Gomez-Palmieri, R. M. Cerda-Flores, K. H. Ritchie, A. Pollock, N. Angerhofer, A. Escobar-Mesa, A. Torroni, N. M. Myres, S. R. Woodward, Sorenson Molecular Genealogy Foundation, SLC, Utah (USA)

“Analysis of the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) control region sequences, including HVS-I, HVS-II and HVS-III, from more than 2,000 subjects revealed an overwhelming Native American legacy in the modern Mexican population, with ~90% of mtDNAs belonging to the four major pan-American haplogroups A2, B2, C1 and D1. This finding supports a European contribution to the Mexican gene pool primarily by male settlers and confirms the effectiveness of employing the uniparentally-transmitted mtDNA as a tool to reconstruct a country’s history.” Read more here…

The origin of Native Americans from a mitochondrial DNA viewpoint. U. A. Perego, A. Achilli, L. Milani, M. Lari, M. Pala, A. Olivieri, B. Hooshiar Kashani, J. E. Gomez-Palmieri, N. Angerhofer, A. Pollock, K. H. Ritchie, N. M. Myres, S. R. Woodward, D. Caramelli, A. Torroni

“Our comprehensive overview of the four pan-American branches of the mtDNA tree suggests a scenario with a human entry and spread into the Americas from Beringia about 20,000 years ago, and preliminary data raise the possibility that the uncommon five Native American haplogroups might have marked additional migratory events from Asia or Beringia. Overall, through a combined analysis of modern and ancient Native American mtDNA, we are making an effort for reconstructing the complex pre-Columbian history at both macro- and micro-geographic levels.” Read more here…

Mitochondrial DNA footprints in modern Mongolia. S. R. Woodward, A. Achilli, U. A. Perego, J. E. Gomez-Palmieri, D. Tumen, E. Myagmar, D. Bayarlhagva, K. H. Ritchie, A. Pollock, N. Angerhofer, A. Torroni, N. M. Myres, Sorenson Molecular Genealogy Foundation, SLC, UT (USA)

“In 2007, through a well-planned collection effort, researchers at the Sorenson Molecular Genealogy Foundation and the National University of Mongolia were able to gather over 3,000 DNA samples, informed consents, and genealogical data throughout the country of Mongolia, including samples from 21 distinct tribal or ethnic populations. All the samples were sequenced for the three hypervariable segments of the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) control region to assess the genetic composition of modern Mongolia.” Read more here…

Early Siberian Maternal Lineages in the Tubalar of Northeastern Altai Inferred from High-Resolution Mitochondrial DNA Analysis. R. Sukernik, I. Mazunin, E. Starikovskaya, N. Volodko, N. Eltsov

“We showed that the core of the Tubalar genetic makeup proved to be a mixture of “west” (H8, U4b, U5a1, and X2e) and “east” Eurasian (A and B1) haplogroups derived from macrohaplogroup N, and Siberian derivatives of the macrohaplogroup M identifiable by subhaplogroup-specific mutations. For example, among the 36 Tubalar mtDNA samples that belong to haplogroup D, 10 (28%) harbored diagnostic markers of the subhaplogroup D3a2a shared with the Chukchi and Eskimos. This finding verified at the complete sequence level we attributed to ancient link between early Siberians, who underwent pronounced differentiation in the Altai-Sayan region, and some of the Eskimo tribes.” Read more here…

Population Structure in Mongolia from a Mitochondrial DNA Perspective. L. Pipes, A. A. Pai, D. Labuda, T. G. Schurr

“To clarify the complex population history of Mongolia, we analyzed variation in the mtDNAs of 190 individuals from several Mongolian ethnic groups, including the Uriankhai, Zakhchin, Derbet, Khoton and Khalkha. We screened all samples for phylogenetically informative coding region SNPs and sequenced HVSI to assess control region variation in them. Our data suggest that the mtDNA diversity present in our population is consistent with the general pattern of variation observed in East Asia, with the most frequent haplogroups being C, D and G. Haplogroup variation in Mongolian ethnic groups reveals considerable maternal diversity with a predominance of basal M types. Interestingly, the Mongolians also possessed West Eurasian haplogroups, such as H, J and K, which are not commonly observed in East Asia, even at low frequencies. Read more here…

Genetic History of human populations of East African inferred from mtDNA and Y chromosome analyses. J. Hirbo, S. Omar, M. Ibrahim, S. Tishkoff

“Our results indicate that East African populations have some of the most ancestral Y chromosome and mtDNA lineages in Africa, suggesting that they may have been an ancient source of dispersion throughout Africa. Additionally, we find evidence for ancient geneflow between East Africa and the Middle East. We also ascertained the effect of the Bantu-expansion and signature of recent migration of Cushitic-speaking groups originating from Ethiopia on peopling of East Africa.” Read more here…

Analysis of mtDNA and Y-chromosome haplogroups in Mexican Mestizos and Amerindian groups. I. Silva-Zolezzi, B. Z. Gonzalez-Sobrino, J. K. Estrada-Gil, A. Contreras, J. C. Fernandez, E. Hernandez-Lemus, L. Sebastian, F. Morales, R. Goya, C. Serrano, G. Jimenez-Sanchez

“For this we included genotypic data from 163 mt SNPs and 123 Y chromosome SNPs present in the Illumina Human1M chip of 450 individuals, 300 mestizos from six states located in different regions: Northern, Central and Southern; and 150 individuals from different Amerindian groups (Tepehuanes, Zapotecos and Mayas). With this information, we are measuring genetic diversity using Fst and AMOVA analysis. Admixture analysis includes average and individual ancestral contribution estimates using autosomal SNPs. Initial results show that in our Mestizo sample, 88% of the mt haplogroups are Amerindian (A, B, C or D), and the rest includes European and African lineages. We have identified differences in proportions of each haplogroup in both Mestizos and Amerindians.” Read more here…

Using mtDNA and Y-chromosome for estimating group ancestry: Implications for case-control studies. K. Stefflova, M. Dulik, A. Pai, A. Walker, T. Schurr, T. Rebbeck

“We examined the possible role of mtDNA and the non-recombining portion of the Y-chr. (NRY) as ancestry informative markers (AIMs) for admixed groups (self-identified African Americans (AA) or European Americans (EA)) collected as part of a prostate cancer case-control study. We deeply typed both mtDNA (HVS-I, II, 36 coding SNPs) and the NRY (37 SNPs) in a group of 226 AA cases and controls and compared this group to 206 EA cases and controls, and 49 Senegalese…We found a sex biased admixture for AA where 13.2% of mtDNAs and 34.5% of NRYs were of non-African origin. We also found a small amount of admixture in EA (~3% mtDNA, 1.5% NRY).” Read more here…

New tool (mtPHYL) proposed for phylogenetic analysis of human complete mitochondrial genomes. N. Eltsov, N. Volodko, E. Starikovskaya, R. Sukernik
“The algorithm which we created was implemented in the mtPHYL. This program reconstructs the phylogenetic trees and calculates the respective ages for the clusters within the tree. It can be used to glean a bulk of entire mitochondrial sequences from GenBank database instantly. In addition, it automatically categorizes the mutations and identifies affected genes along with their conservation indices and amino acid replacements. Our software may be easily modified to analyze any non-recombining DNA regions. mtPHYL is available from authors upon request (eltsovnp@bionet.nsc.ru) and at www.bionet.nsc.ru/labs/mtgenome/programs.html.” Read more here…

Y chromosome microsatellite haplotypes in the Hutterite founders. M. Caliskan, I. Pichler, C. Platzer, P. P. Pramstaller, C. Ober

“The current population of >12,000 Schmiedeleut Hutterites are descendants of 38 male founders who were born between 1700 and 1830 in Europe. Only 12 of these founders, each with a unique surname, have living male descendants related through male-only lineages. DNA samples were available in our laboratory for 75 male descendants of 11 of the 12 founders, accounting for 673 independent paternal meioses. We genotyped 9 microsatellite loci, which included a mean of 6.8 (range 2-23) males per lineage to evaluate potential relationships between the founders. Fourteen different haplotypes were identified, with an average of 3.5 (range 1-8) pairwise differences between haplotypes. All descendants within each of 9 lineages had identical Y haplotypes. Descendents of two of these lineages, 2 and 10, had the same haplotype despite different surnames, suggesting possible relatedness between the founders of these two lineages.” Read more here…

Genetic variation in tribes of Eastern and North-Eastern India: inference from distribution of Y-chromosomal polymorphisms. M. Borkar, F. Ahmed, F. Khan, S. Agrawal
“Objectives: To investigate the paternal population history of total 607 individuals from nine populations of Eastern and North-Eastern tribes from India. Methods: 34 binary markers and 17 short-tandem-repeat loci from the non-recombining part of the human Y chromosome were analyzed by RFLP, Sequencing and Genescanning. Results: The tribal populations were characterized by a diverse set of 15 haplogroups. A single haplogroup (O-M175) accounts for ~70% of North-East Indian Y chromosomes.” Read more here…

Inferential Genotyping in Mormon Founders and Utah pedigrees. J. Gitschier
One concern in human genetics research is maintaining the privacy of individuals who contribute samples for investigation. While this concern is raised typically in the context of private medical information, I would argue that a signficant contributor to loss of privacy may lie with genealogical investigations, as much information is freely available online through a variety of websites, thus facilitating the discovery of genetic relationships. During sabbatical in the laboratory of Chris Tyler-Smith (Wellcome Trust Sanger Center), I genotyped the Y chromosome of HapMap samples with 16 short tandem repeat (STR) markers as well as lineage specific markers to determine whether the Y chromosome genetic information in this sample was consonant with the purported ancestry of the subjects. As one of the HapMap populations (CEU) is comprised of Utah pedigrees of European descent, I then queried whether the contributors of these samples might be descendents of Joseph Smith and Brigham Young, two founders of the Latter-day Saints. Remarkably, through iterative use of two online archives, FamilySearch and Sorenson Molecular Genetic Foundation, I was able to infer the Y chromosome STR haplotypes of these two founders. Although none of the CEU contributors appeared to be direct descendents of the two men, based on haplotype analysis, I was able to make predictions for the surnames of the CEU participants by the same process. For more than half of the unrelated CEU samples (16/30), at least one exact match was revealed and for 13 of these, a single surname was associated. For the remaining 14 samples, a match was nearly perfect, with only one or two of the microsatellite markers varying, typically by only one repeat unit, as might be expected through microsatellite instability within a pedigree. By contributing samples and information to repositories specializing in genetic genealogy, individuals make important contributions to our collective knowledge, but they do so at the risk of revealing personal information shared by unwitting relatives. This problem will be exacerbated as genome-wide markers and sequences, which may bear physical, health and behavioral information, emerge and are employed in genealogical research.

Journalist Maggie Greenhouse writes an entertaining article about genetic genealogy entitled “Who Do You Think You Are? Company Can Help Trace Genetic Ancestry” (Houston Chronicle, Sept. 19, 2008) .  Much of the article is about Oxford Ancestors (OA), a genetic genealogy company based in England, but the article also mentions some companies in the United States:

“Houston is also home to Family Tree DNA, a company that offers the same services as Oxford Ancestors. Last year, Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates joined forces with Family Tree DNA to help African Americans looking for answers about their past. AfricanDNA, the company Gates launched in November 2007, offers both genetic testing and genealogical tracing services for African Americans.”

Interestingly, the article mentions that OA databases have DNA from approximately 30,000 people.  By the way, I also noticed that the OA website has been completely redesigned.  It was a much needed update and looks good

Welcome to the September 14, 2008 edition of Gene Genie!  Bloggers have begun to pick up posting with the end of summer, and it seems like everyday there’s a bunch of new interesting posts about the human genome.

96well at Reportergene presents “Trends in development of reporter genes.”  Reportergene is also looking for bloggers/reporters to join the blog’s community and help create the “main repository of news and tools for reportergenomists.”  See here for more information.

fightingfatigue presents » Have Japanese Researchers Found Diagnostic Tool for ME/CFS? posted at Fighting Fatigue.  According to a study discussed in the article, there might now be a test able to diagnose Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.

Genomes by the Handful

Human genomes are being sequenced by the handful these days.  Knome has recently delivered their first sequenced genomes to customers on 8gb USB drives placed in engraved boxes.  Additionally, news came last week that the first Arab genome had been sequenced.  As Mailund on the Internet asks, is this news anymore?

What good are all these genomes if the non-scientist citizen doesn’t understand anything about genetics?  Andrew at Think Gene discusses a lesson created by Dana Waring and colleagues at the Personal Genetics Education Project in “Personal Genetics Education Project: Lesson 1”

Lower Prices

On September 8th, 23andMe announced a reduction in the price of their DNA analysis from $999 to $399.  The news was discussed on Dienekes’ Anthropology Blog, Eye on DNA, bbgm, ScienceRoll, and at Geneforum.  It even led Attila to buy a kit.  The price drop also prompted a great discussion among some of the members of the DNA Network.  First, see “Cheap personal genomics: the death-knell for the industry?” at Genetic Future.  Andrew at Think Gene writes “23andMe Is DTC Genomics and Nobody Should Be Surprised” and “Why the “Database Sale Story” is Silly.”  This in turn is mentioned by Steve the Gene Sherpa at “A lot to chew and then spit!“  See also my “Follow-Up to 23andMe’s Price Drop.”

The Marriage Gene?

Mary Meets Dolly discusses “The marriage gene“, in which an article in the Baltimore Sun writes that “men who lack a particular variant of a gene that influences brain activity are more likely to be devoted, loving husbands and more likely to be involved with women who praise them as emotionally close and available.”  Rebecca Taylor mentions that genes are rarely the sole influencing factor in anyone’s behavior.

As a bit of housekeeping, if you aren’t already subscribed to the DNA Network, be sure to note that Daniel’s Genetic Future has moved to Scienceblogs.  Update your RSS feed!

Dinosaur Beer

Last but not least, news about ancient yeast.  Although this isn’t related to human genetics, I did my graduate research on yeast and thought I would indulge a little here.  Aminopop mentions that a new brewing company, Fossil Fuels, is making beer with revived 25-million year-old yeast.  Apparently, “the ancient yeast provides the wheat beer with a distinctively ‘clove-y’ taste and a ‘weird spiciness at the finish.’”

So ends the 37th edition of Gene Genie.  Edition 38 will be hosted in a few weeks.  You can submit your blog article for the next edition at the carnival submission form. Past posts and future hosts can be found on the blog carnival index page, or at the official Gene Genie blog!