counter free hit unique web

Q&A: Everyone Has Two Family Trees – A Genealogical Tree and a Genetic Tree

I recently received an interesting question from a reader (see this comment) about 23andMe’s Relative Finder, and thought it would be worth sharing the question and my answer with all my readers.

The Question:

I’m a man who recently took a 23andMe test, and I have a question about Relative Finder.  Another man who I match on 36 of 37 Y-DNA markers via Family Tree DNA also took a 23andMe test.  We believe that we are third cousins, but this individual does not show up as related in Relative Finder, nor does he show any similarities in the Family Inheritance section.  Does this mean that we are not related at all?

The Answer

If two individuals do not share any DNA in the Family Inheritance section of 23andMe or do not appear as relatives in Relative Finder, this absolutely does not mean that they are not or cannot be relatives.  It does suggest, however, that the two individuals might not share any DNA.  Although your Y-DNA test suggests that you share a recent common male ancestor, it appears that apart from your Y chromosomes you do not share any other DNA.

DNA is randomly passed down from generation to generation.  A parent does not pass on their entire genetic makeup to a child; as a result, bits and pieces of DNA are lost in each generation.

Cousins will only share DNA if they happen to have randomly inherited that DNA from their shared ancestors.  With each generation that separates the cousins, the probability that they share DNA decreases, because with every generation it is more likely that they will not inherit DNA from their ever-more-remote shared ancestors.

Third cousins, for example, share only 2 of their 16 ancestors at 4 generations.  In this example, it appears that those two ancestors did not contribute an identical segment to both you and your third cousin.  Interestingly, it is possible that both you and your cousin have segments of DNA from these ancestors, but they wouldn’t show up as a match in Family Inheritance or Relative Finder unless they were the same segment of DNA.

Also keep in mind that a 23andMe test is only comparing those sections of the DNA that are examined by the test; a whole-genome test, currently not available to consumers (at least at an affordable price), is the only test that can compare an individual’s entire DNA makeup to another’s.

Two Family Trees

In reality, everyone has two family trees.  The first is a Genealogical Tree, which is every ancestor in history that had a child who had a child who had a child…that ultimately led to you.  Every decision made by every person in that tree contributed to who and what you are today.

However, not every person in that tree contributed a segment of your DNA sequence (because of random inheritance, as discussed above).  As a result, we have a second family tree – a Genetic Tree – which is a tree that contains only those ancestors who contributed to our DNA.  No one has yet been able to construct their Genetic Tree, but soon it will be a reality thanks to advances in genetic sequencing and comparison such Relative Finder.  These tools are using relatedness between people living today to deduce the inheritance of DNA from people who have been dead for centuries.

I have many questions about Genetic Trees that I’m looking forward to answering with new tools in the future, including the following:

  • At 10 generations, I have approximately 1024 ancestors (although I know there is some overlap).  How many of these ancestors are part of my Genetic Tree?  Is it a very small number?  A surprisingly large number?
  • What percentage, on average, of an individual’s genealogical tree at X generations is part of their genetic tree?

What questions about Genetic Trees can you come up with?

2 Comments

  1. Pamela Rowe
    Posted 10 November 2009 at 11:41 am | Permalink

    This is quite an informative article. It is also an excellent summary for what is happening right now at 23&Me with Relative Finder, Thank You.

  2. Posted 10 November 2009 at 2:21 pm | Permalink

    This is a great post - Hadn’t ever thought of it quite like this but it makes perfect sense!

3 Trackbacks

  1. By fejes.ca: Article Roundup - November 9-11, 2009 on 13 November 2009 at 1:25 am

    Kramer auto Pingback[...] between DTC genotyping risks - LinkThe difference between Genetic and Genealogical family trees - LinkHelicos no longer selling itself - LinkResearchMatch: an NIH resource to link volunteers with [...]

  2. By Apple's Tree: Weekly Rewind on 14 November 2009 at 2:18 pm

    Kramer auto Pingback[...] subject but that’s OK because the brilliant, Dr. Blaine Bettinger continues to teach me. Check out Everyone Has Two Family Trees - A Genealogical Tree and a Genetic Tree at The Genetic Genealogist. - And while you are there congratulate Blaine on passing the Bar [...]

  3. Kramer auto Pingback[...] ancestry of genes. Also see Genealogical vs. genetic ancestors and Blaine Bettinger’s post on genealogical and genetic trees. While Relative Finder will uncover the occasional surprising distant relationship, mostly it will [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*