<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Famous DNA Review, Part IV &#8211; Jesse James</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2008/02/15/famous-dna-review-part-iv-jesse-james/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2008/02/15/famous-dna-review-part-iv-jesse-james/</link>
	<description>Adding DNA to the Genealogist&#039;s Toolbox</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:54:39 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TruthHunt</title>
		<link>http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2008/02/15/famous-dna-review-part-iv-jesse-james/comment-page-1/#comment-6791</link>
		<dc:creator>TruthHunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2008/02/15/famous-dna-review-part-iv-jesse-james/#comment-6791</guid>
		<description>For Immediate Use                                               Press Release                                                      


Betty Duke
512-515-5685 
7/21/2011



1995 Outlaw Jesse James DNA Results Fraudulent
 
 
 
Stephen Caruso, the Deputy Counselor for Clay County, Missouri during the 1995 exhumation and subsequent DNA testing of Jesse James’ reported grave, recently revealed that the 1995 DNA results touted as proving with a 99.7 degree of certainty that the infamous outlaw Jesse James died and is buried as history reports are fraudulent.  During separate telephone conversations with Texas author Betty Dorsett Duke and Missourian Greg Ellison he (Caruso) said that instead of abiding by Clay County Judge Vic Howard’s order to hand over hair and teeth stored at the James Farm &amp; Museum for DNA testing, he gave him hair he obtained from the head of John Hartman, Director of the Clay County Park’s Department in 1995.  The Clay County Parks Department owns and operates the James Farm &amp; Museum, and Caruso represented them (the farm and museum) in their attempt to prevent the hair and teeth from being obtained by Starrs.  
There are two graves bearing Jesse James’ name in Clay County, Missouri, the original grave a few miles from Kearney in the yard of Jesse James’ boyhood home now turned tourist attraction and the grave in Kearney’s Mt. Olivet Cemetery.  The original grave was exhumed in 1902 for the purpose of reinterring the remains in Mt. Olivet Cemetery, and then re-exhumed in 1978 to retrieve remains that were left behind in 1902.  
Drs. Stone and Stoneking at Penn State University performed the DNA tests and maintain that the hair and teeth used for DNA testing were obtained from the 1978 dig of the original grave, but in 2001 Caruso told NBC 8 KOMU TV Anchorman Jim Riek that the teeth submitted for DNA testing “had nothing to do with the teeth that were dug up.” 
Obviously the final DNA report contains conflicting statements.  Again, Dr. Stone, Dr. Stoneking, and Professor Starrs state that the mtDNA results do not prove the remains are those of Jesse James yet they also claim “…The DNA results are agreeable with other scientific investigations of the exhumed remains”. Knowing that Caruso claims to have obtained the hair used for DNA testing from Hartman’s head, and also knowing that he said the teeth had nothing to do with the teeth that were dug up, one naturally concludes that none of \the other scientific investigations\ are agreeable with the hair and teeth used for DNA testing.  Their report also states that there is no scientific basis for doubting the exhumed remains are those of Jesse James. 
                                                                        MORE
Duke begs to differ due to the following reasons: Professor Starrs used no chain of custody guidelines for the human remains submitted for  DNA testing; The hair submitted for DNA testing originated from the head of John Hartman; The teeth submitted for DNA testing are of unknown origin and had nothing to do with the teeth that were dug up;  Hartman said, “The results of the 1995 exhumation should be published as they were found, not as they have been framed or sanitized for public consumption;” The validity of the two DNA reference sources&#039; is highly questionable; and Drs. Stone and Stoneking’s DNA results are highly questionable. 
Being well aware that the statute of limitations is up on the crime Caruso and Hartman reportedly committed, Duke and Ellison decided to report it to Clay County, Missouri in order for truth to prevail.  On July 12, 2011 their  notarized affidavits were faxed to the Clay County Prosecuting Attorney.
Jim Roberts, spokesman for the Clay County Prosecutor’s Office, replied to Duke via email telling her that Clay County is not lending any credence to Caruso’s confession of fraud and won’t investigate it.  Duke left several telephone messages requesting for Clay County Prosecuting Attorney Dan White to call her, but as of this date he has failed to do so. 
In 1999 Duke petitioned Falls County Judge Meyer to grant an order to exhume the grave in Blevins Cemetery bearing James L. Courtney’s name for DNA testing purposes. Although initially disappointed that he denied her request she now realizes that it was for the best.  Why?   Because even if Jesse James did assume the alias of James L. Courtney and lived and died in Texas, the fraudulent DNA sequence his DNA sequence would have been compared against would have shown that he wasn’t. 
After hearing all of her life that her paternal great-grandfather was Jesse James and dedicating a large portion of her life to either prove or disprove it, Duke is now convinced the story is true thanks to a recently discovered eBay photo of the James family.  She knows Jesse James was born in Clay County, Missouri but the eBay photo literally shows what DNA failed to prove - Jesse James got away with his own 1882 murder and lived out the remainder of his life in Texas as James L. Courtney.       
The photo may be viewed at this link: http://www.jessejamesintexas.com/index.htm.
END</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For Immediate Use                                               Press Release                                                      </p>
<p>Betty Duke<br />
512-515-5685<br />
7/21/2011</p>
<p>1995 Outlaw Jesse James DNA Results Fraudulent</p>
<p>Stephen Caruso, the Deputy Counselor for Clay County, Missouri during the 1995 exhumation and subsequent DNA testing of Jesse James’ reported grave, recently revealed that the 1995 DNA results touted as proving with a 99.7 degree of certainty that the infamous outlaw Jesse James died and is buried as history reports are fraudulent.  During separate telephone conversations with Texas author Betty Dorsett Duke and Missourian Greg Ellison he (Caruso) said that instead of abiding by Clay County Judge Vic Howard’s order to hand over hair and teeth stored at the James Farm &amp; Museum for DNA testing, he gave him hair he obtained from the head of John Hartman, Director of the Clay County Park’s Department in 1995.  The Clay County Parks Department owns and operates the James Farm &amp; Museum, and Caruso represented them (the farm and museum) in their attempt to prevent the hair and teeth from being obtained by Starrs.<br />
There are two graves bearing Jesse James’ name in Clay County, Missouri, the original grave a few miles from Kearney in the yard of Jesse James’ boyhood home now turned tourist attraction and the grave in Kearney’s Mt. Olivet Cemetery.  The original grave was exhumed in 1902 for the purpose of reinterring the remains in Mt. Olivet Cemetery, and then re-exhumed in 1978 to retrieve remains that were left behind in 1902.<br />
Drs. Stone and Stoneking at Penn State University performed the DNA tests and maintain that the hair and teeth used for DNA testing were obtained from the 1978 dig of the original grave, but in 2001 Caruso told NBC 8 KOMU TV Anchorman Jim Riek that the teeth submitted for DNA testing “had nothing to do with the teeth that were dug up.”<br />
Obviously the final DNA report contains conflicting statements.  Again, Dr. Stone, Dr. Stoneking, and Professor Starrs state that the mtDNA results do not prove the remains are those of Jesse James yet they also claim “…The DNA results are agreeable with other scientific investigations of the exhumed remains”. Knowing that Caruso claims to have obtained the hair used for DNA testing from Hartman’s head, and also knowing that he said the teeth had nothing to do with the teeth that were dug up, one naturally concludes that none of \the other scientific investigations\ are agreeable with the hair and teeth used for DNA testing.  Their report also states that there is no scientific basis for doubting the exhumed remains are those of Jesse James.<br />
                                                                        MORE<br />
Duke begs to differ due to the following reasons: Professor Starrs used no chain of custody guidelines for the human remains submitted for  DNA testing; The hair submitted for DNA testing originated from the head of John Hartman; The teeth submitted for DNA testing are of unknown origin and had nothing to do with the teeth that were dug up;  Hartman said, “The results of the 1995 exhumation should be published as they were found, not as they have been framed or sanitized for public consumption;” The validity of the two DNA reference sources&#8217; is highly questionable; and Drs. Stone and Stoneking’s DNA results are highly questionable.<br />
Being well aware that the statute of limitations is up on the crime Caruso and Hartman reportedly committed, Duke and Ellison decided to report it to Clay County, Missouri in order for truth to prevail.  On July 12, 2011 their  notarized affidavits were faxed to the Clay County Prosecuting Attorney.<br />
Jim Roberts, spokesman for the Clay County Prosecutor’s Office, replied to Duke via email telling her that Clay County is not lending any credence to Caruso’s confession of fraud and won’t investigate it.  Duke left several telephone messages requesting for Clay County Prosecuting Attorney Dan White to call her, but as of this date he has failed to do so.<br />
In 1999 Duke petitioned Falls County Judge Meyer to grant an order to exhume the grave in Blevins Cemetery bearing James L. Courtney’s name for DNA testing purposes. Although initially disappointed that he denied her request she now realizes that it was for the best.  Why?   Because even if Jesse James did assume the alias of James L. Courtney and lived and died in Texas, the fraudulent DNA sequence his DNA sequence would have been compared against would have shown that he wasn’t.<br />
After hearing all of her life that her paternal great-grandfather was Jesse James and dedicating a large portion of her life to either prove or disprove it, Duke is now convinced the story is true thanks to a recently discovered eBay photo of the James family.  She knows Jesse James was born in Clay County, Missouri but the eBay photo literally shows what DNA failed to prove &#8211; Jesse James got away with his own 1882 murder and lived out the remainder of his life in Texas as James L. Courtney.<br />
The photo may be viewed at this link: <a href="http://www.jessejamesintexas.com/index.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.jessejamesintexas.com/index.htm</a>.<br />
END</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ott'r</title>
		<link>http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2008/02/15/famous-dna-review-part-iv-jesse-james/comment-page-1/#comment-5353</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ott'r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 22:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2008/02/15/famous-dna-review-part-iv-jesse-james/#comment-5353</guid>
		<description>Wrongful death attorney:  That is my interest, to ascertain if my family is directly descended.  Our family&#039;s geneology indicates that a great-great (maybe three times great) grandmother of ours, Jeanette (Last name unknow right now, my mother is looking it up) is alleged to have conjugally visited with JWJ when he was in town.  The result was my great great grandmother, Viola (Prichett) Gillentine, born 01/20/1871.  I have a nephew who has a DNA sample and profile, so we are currently in the process of cross matching the information.  Our fingers are crossed.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrongful death attorney:  That is my interest, to ascertain if my family is directly descended.  Our family&#8217;s geneology indicates that a great-great (maybe three times great) grandmother of ours, Jeanette (Last name unknow right now, my mother is looking it up) is alleged to have conjugally visited with JWJ when he was in town.  The result was my great great grandmother, Viola (Prichett) Gillentine, born 01/20/1871.  I have a nephew who has a DNA sample and profile, so we are currently in the process of cross matching the information.  Our fingers are crossed&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse James - Topic Powered by Social Strata</title>
		<link>http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2008/02/15/famous-dna-review-part-iv-jesse-james/comment-page-1/#comment-4987</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse James - Topic Powered by Social Strata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 15:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2008/02/15/famous-dna-review-part-iv-jesse-james/#comment-4987</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] 2010 10:50:56 GMT-0800&#039;, &#039;February 17, 2010 01:50 PM&#039;)+&#039;&#039;); February 17, 2010 01:50 PM Hide Post   http://www.thegeneticgenealogi...part-iv-jesse-james/Remember this is the media. I could make up some pretty interesting stories myself but at some [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] 2010 10:50:56 GMT-0800&#8242;, &#8216;February 17, 2010 01:50 PM&#8217;)+&#8221;); February 17, 2010 01:50 PM Hide Post   <a href="http://www.thegeneticgenealogi...part-iv-jesse-james/Remember" rel="nofollow">http://www.thegeneticgenealogi&#8230;part-iv-jesse-james/Remember</a> this is the media. I could make up some pretty interesting stories myself but at some [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy@lake forest wrongful death attorney</title>
		<link>http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2008/02/15/famous-dna-review-part-iv-jesse-james/comment-page-1/#comment-3861</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy@lake forest wrongful death attorney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2008/02/15/famous-dna-review-part-iv-jesse-james/#comment-3861</guid>
		<description>Interesting, but what about the other children.  Any information who may be the direct descendants.  It would be really cool to find out you were a direct descendant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, but what about the other children.  Any information who may be the direct descendants.  It would be really cool to find out you were a direct descendant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Genea-Musings: February 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2008/02/15/famous-dna-review-part-iv-jesse-james/comment-page-1/#comment-3509</link>
		<dc:creator>Genea-Musings: February 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2008/02/15/famous-dna-review-part-iv-jesse-james/#comment-3509</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] hose effect&quot; of Internet genealogy - can you advise him? He makes some great observations too!* &quot;Famous DNA Review, Part IV: Jesse James&quot; by Blaine Bettinger on The Genetic Genealogist blog. Blaine discusses the mitochrondrial DNA [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] hose effect&#8221; of Internet genealogy &#8211; can you advise him? He makes some great observations too!* &#8220;Famous DNA Review, Part IV: Jesse James&#8221; by Blaine Bettinger on The Genetic Genealogist blog. Blaine discusses the mitochrondrial DNA [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exhuming jesse james for DNA - Dogpile Web Search</title>
		<link>http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2008/02/15/famous-dna-review-part-iv-jesse-james/comment-page-1/#comment-3054</link>
		<dc:creator>exhuming jesse james for DNA - Dogpile Web Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 04:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2008/02/15/famous-dna-review-part-iv-jesse-james/#comment-3054</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] ...       www.aboutbillythekid.com/billy_the_kid_dna_investi...   &#149; Found on Windows Live     Famous DNA Review, Part IV - Jesse James &#187; The Genetic Genealogist   Feb 15, 2008 ... They exhumed the body believed to be that of James from the Mt. Olivet ... is [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] &#8230;       <a href="http://www.aboutbillythekid.com/billy_the_kid_dna_investi.." rel="nofollow">http://www.aboutbillythekid.com/billy_the_kid_dna_investi..</a>.   &#8226; Found on Windows Live     Famous DNA Review, Part IV &#8211; Jesse James &#187; The Genetic Genealogist   Feb 15, 2008 &#8230; They exhumed the body believed to be that of James from the Mt. Olivet &#8230; is [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitochondrial experiment - SNPedia</title>
		<link>http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2008/02/15/famous-dna-review-part-iv-jesse-james/comment-page-1/#comment-1673</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitochondrial experiment - SNPedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2008/02/15/famous-dna-review-part-iv-jesse-james/#comment-1673</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] SNPedia  Jump to: navigation, search  http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2008/02/15/famous-dna-review-part-iv-jesse-james/ http://www.mitosearch.org/search_view.asp?uid=EEYCU&amp;viewuid=EEYCU&amp;p=1 rs45517935 [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] SNPedia  Jump to: navigation, search  <a href="http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2008/02/15/famous-dna-review-part-iv-jesse-james/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2008/02/15/famous-dna-review-part-iv-jesse-james/</a> <a href="http://www.mitosearch.org/search_view.asp?uid=EEYCU&amp;viewuid=EEYCU&amp;p=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.mitosearch.org/search_view.asp?uid=EEYCU&amp;viewuid=EEYCU&amp;p=1</a> rs45517935 [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Genetic Genealogist - MyBlogLog</title>
		<link>http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2008/02/15/famous-dna-review-part-iv-jesse-james/comment-page-1/#comment-1563</link>
		<dc:creator>The Genetic Genealogist - MyBlogLog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 01:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2008/02/15/famous-dna-review-part-iv-jesse-james/#comment-1563</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Genealogist! If you click on the link here you&#8217;ll be taken to the. Topics: Miscellaneous   Famous DNA Review, Part IV - Jesse James - 5 days ago Jesse Woodson James, born September 5, 1847 and died April 3, 1882, was an infamous [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Genealogist! If you click on the link here you&#8217;ll be taken to the. Topics: Miscellaneous   Famous DNA Review, Part IV &#8211; Jesse James &#8211; 5 days ago Jesse Woodson James, born September 5, 1847 and died April 3, 1882, was an infamous [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Genea-Musings: Best of the Genea-Blogs - 10-16 February 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2008/02/15/famous-dna-review-part-iv-jesse-james/comment-page-1/#comment-1562</link>
		<dc:creator>Genea-Musings: Best of the Genea-Blogs - 10-16 February 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2008/02/15/famous-dna-review-part-iv-jesse-james/#comment-1562</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] hose effect&quot; of Internet genealogy - can you advise him? He makes some great observations too!* &quot;Famous DNA Review, Part IV: Jesse James&quot; by Blaine Bettinger on The Genetic Genealogist blog. Blaine discusses the mitochrondrial DNA [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] hose effect&#8221; of Internet genealogy &#8211; can you advise him? He makes some great observations too!* &#8220;Famous DNA Review, Part IV: Jesse James&#8221; by Blaine Bettinger on The Genetic Genealogist blog. Blaine discusses the mitochrondrial DNA [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

