http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2008/01/11/personal-genomics-in-the-new-england-journal-of-medicine/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=personal-genomics-in-the-new-england-journal-of-medicine Adding DNA to the Genealogist's Toolbox Tue, 18 Jun 2013 05:01:27 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2008/01/11/personal-genomics-in-the-new-england-journal-of-medicine/comment-page-1/#comment-1380 The Latest 23andMe Update » The Genetic Genealogist Sat, 19 Jan 2008 12:03:15 +0000 http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2008/01/11/personal-genomics-in-the-new-england-journal-of-medicine/#comment-1380 [...] not give any substantive analysis and merely cites the recent NEJM article (which, as you’ll recall, was not about genetic [...]

]]> http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2008/01/11/personal-genomics-in-the-new-england-journal-of-medicine/comment-page-1/#comment-1310 Playing personal genomics catchup : business|bytes|genes|molecules Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:39:09 +0000 http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2008/01/11/personal-genomics-in-the-new-england-journal-of-medicine/#comment-1310 [...] on personal genomics, resulted in a flurry of discussion. Notable follow up includes blog posts by Blaine Bettinger and Steve Murphy. I maintain my position that the cat is out of the bag, and there are enough [...]

]]> http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2008/01/11/personal-genomics-in-the-new-england-journal-of-medicine/comment-page-1/#comment-1374 PredictER Blog Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2008/01/11/personal-genomics-in-the-new-england-journal-of-medicine/#comment-1374 personal genome analysis through genetic profile tests capable of identifying several hundred thousand variations in any one genome, has drawn the attention of several astute bloggers, including: Myles Axton of Free Association, Blaine Bettinger ofThe Genetic Genealogist, Hsien-Hsien Lei of Eye on DNA, and Steve Murphy of Gene Sherpas. The general conclusion of the NEJM authors is that perhaps a person may get their wish, but the clinician certainly won’t. Why is that? Because the predictive value of many of the

]]>