counter free hit unique web

DYS464 and Male Infertility

Dr. Mark A. Jobling at the University of Leicester published a study in 2005 that examined DYS464, a Y-DNA marker commonly sequenced for genetic genealogical purposes. As it turns out, sequencing DYS464 can inadvertently detect an AZFc deletion. Deletion of AZFc (azoospermia factor c) causes spermatogenic failure and subsequently, male infertility. This marker is tested by at least 6 firms.

Dr. Jobling pointed out that a previous study had concluded that an AZFc deletion could be found in 1 in every 4000 males. In Dr. Jobling’s study there were 3 cases in 3255 males tested, which he states is “not significantly different from 1 in 4000.” A story in the New Scientist stated that “a study by Jobling’s team suggests that 1 in 1000 men has the deletion,” but I think that is an overstatement by the media. I haven’t seen anywhere that Dr. Jobling made such a statement - he was merely listing some of his data. Elsewhere, Ann Turner has suggested that at FTDNA, the number is around 1 in 8,000. Although the exact frequency has not yet been determined, it appears that it is rather low.

The number of markers tested will undoubtedly continue to rise before we cross The Barrier, the move from individual STRs to full-genome sequencing. As a result, the probability that a tested marker could reveal more than just genealogical information will become more and more likely. It is, and always will be, important that individuals be aware of the possible consequences of DNA testing BEFORE they undergo DNA testing. Naturally, this awareness is the responsibility of both the DNA testing firm and the individual.

HT: Hsien, and thank you to the Journal of Medical Genetics for making this paper open access.



  

5 Comments

  1. Posted 25 July 2007 at 6:50 am | Permalink

    It bears repeating that this could cause problems in two ways:

    1) Men who don’t have biological children may suddenly find they’re not able to.

    2) Men who already have children may find that they’re not the biological father.

    I haven’t seen any testing company explain let alone mention this possibility. Seems like it might be time to replace this marker with another?

  2. Posted 25 July 2007 at 7:34 am | Permalink

    this year in our lab there were 2 male inferetility cases with Y microdeletion (AZFc) detected - the first cases when this test is performed (c.a. 3 years). EMQN has very good guidelines for this simple multiplex PCR test with primers listed - you can virtually perform it at home if you have PCR machine - its very easy test:)
    http://www.emqn.org/emqn/BestPractice/mainColumnParagraphs/011/document/AZF_Guidelines_2004.pdf
    To my knowledge Y microdeletions are the cause around 7,3% of all male infertility, and even 66% for azospermia cases).

  3. Posted 25 July 2007 at 9:09 am | Permalink

    Hsien - The problem is that DYS464 is such a valuable marker. Unfortunately, I think that the secrets revealed by DNA are only going to get much, much worse. All sequencing companies are going to have to make iron-tight releases to survive. I wonder what the releases for paternity testing firms are like?

    Ramūnas - Thank you for stopping by! I think it would be very interesting to see a study of the actual frequency, but the sample size would have to be pretty big.
    Do you think there will be a day when everyone has a PCR machine at home? I can picture it: “Mom, what kind of bug is this?” “I don’t know, mash it up and stick it in the sequencer!”

  4. Posted 25 July 2007 at 10:22 am | Permalink

    Yeah, I don’t know if the problem is as bad for paternity tests because they typically only examine around 16 markers. But when you have companies that are offering 67 Y-DNA markers a pop, then there’s definitely more chances of there being some unexpected results!

  5. Posted 25 July 2007 at 5:41 pm | Permalink

    hi. well, who knows - before 30 years idea about personal computer was ridiculous. And now there is personal DNA analyzer on the market already: http://cancergenetics.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/personalized-dna-analyser-precautions/
    but maybe we do not need to amplify anything in a near future? - http://helicosbio.com/62BF65F522E048CEB03FAF69C4AB7B07.asp?ps_key=167F2249805D46CBBCFA9411F774CD4F&page=1&ie_key=1E21A8B7AC5043279851D73C51DC420B

7 Trackbacks

  1. […] It is important to note, however, that some medical information (such as infertility detected by DYS464 testing or other diseases detectable by a full mtDNA sequence) might inadvertently be revealed by a genetic […]

  2. By DearMYRTLE on 25 October 2007 at 6:56 pm

    links from Technoratiof the information obtained by genetic genealogy tests has no known medical relevancy, and these firms are not actively looking for medical information. It is important to note, however, that some medical information (such as infertility detected byDYS464 testingor other diseases detectable by a full mtDNA sequence) might inadvertently be revealed by a genetic genealogy test. 8. I don’t like the thought of a company having my DNA on file or my losing control over my DNA sample.

  3. By DearMYRTLE's Genealogy Blog on 25 October 2007 at 6:56 pm

    links from Technoratiof the information obtained by genetic genealogy tests has no known medical relevancy, and these firms are not actively looking for medical information. It is important to note, however, that some medical information (such as infertility detected byDYS464 testingor other diseases detectable by a full mtDNA sequence) might inadvertently be revealed by a genetic genealogy test. 8. I don’t like the thought of a company having my DNA on file or my losing control over my DNA sample.

  4. By Infertility Blog on 8 November 2007 at 6:54 pm

    Kramer auto Pingback[…] The Genetic Genealogist - " DYS464 and Male Infertility […]

  5. By “One Package Fits All” DNA Testing on 4 January 2008 at 12:17 pm

    […] summer, the DYS464 Y-DNA marker was found to be associated with spermatogenic failure and consequently, male infertility. The frequency of the specific AZFc deletion in the DYS464 […]

  6. By Eye on DNA — How will it change your life? on 4 January 2008 at 4:15 pm

    links from Technoratitheir medical history. The target market for the two sides of consumer genetic testing may overlap, but not completely. So, difficulty arises when unexpected results surface from what were supposed to be purely genealogy-based DNA tests. Last summer,the DYS464 Y-DNA marker was found to be associated with spermatogenic failureand consequently, male infertility. The frequency of the specific AZFc deletion in the DYS464 marker could be as rare as 1 in every 8000 markers and as common as 1 in 1000. According to The Genetic Genealogist

  7. […] of genetic sequence data, which might include the discovery of a medically relevant genotype (e.g., male infertility and genealogy testing) and health insurance […]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*