<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lotsa Links &#8211; Forbes Magazine and Genetic Genealogy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2007/06/02/lotsa-links-forbes-magazine-and-genetic-genealogy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2007/06/02/lotsa-links-forbes-magazine-and-genetic-genealogy/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=lotsa-links-forbes-magazine-and-genetic-genealogy</link>
	<description>Adding DNA to the Genealogist&#039;s Toolbox</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:58:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dino</title>
		<link>http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2007/06/02/lotsa-links-forbes-magazine-and-genetic-genealogy/comment-page-1/#comment-1397</link>
		<dc:creator>Dino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2007/06/02/lotsa-links-forbes-magazine-and-genetic-genealogy/#comment-1397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[interesting]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apostolos</title>
		<link>http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2007/06/02/lotsa-links-forbes-magazine-and-genetic-genealogy/comment-page-1/#comment-1339</link>
		<dc:creator>Apostolos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2007/06/02/lotsa-links-forbes-magazine-and-genetic-genealogy/#comment-1339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thanos</title>
		<link>http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2007/06/02/lotsa-links-forbes-magazine-and-genetic-genealogy/comment-page-1/#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator>Thanos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 03:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2007/06/02/lotsa-links-forbes-magazine-and-genetic-genealogy/#comment-469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hsien Lei</title>
		<link>http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2007/06/02/lotsa-links-forbes-magazine-and-genetic-genealogy/comment-page-1/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Hsien Lei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2007/06/02/lotsa-links-forbes-magazine-and-genetic-genealogy/#comment-149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Craig Venter is a brilliant PR guy, isn&#039;t he?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig Venter is a brilliant PR guy, isn&#8217;t he?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Genomicron</title>
		<link>http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2007/06/02/lotsa-links-forbes-magazine-and-genetic-genealogy/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Genomicron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2007/06/02/lotsa-links-forbes-magazine-and-genetic-genealogy/#comment-144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt; (ScienceDaily)  Is one less catchy than the other? It seems to me that getting the history and the science right would be relatively simple and would only add to the strength of a story.  ____________  Updates:  The Genetic Genealogist mentions the story and argues that Nicholas Wade may not be responsible for the headline. Fair enough -- my criticism is about the entire presentation, whether that be the fault of the author, editor, or other. It does bear noting, however, that Wade&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%--> (ScienceDaily)  Is one less catchy than the other? It seems to me that getting the history and the science right would be relatively simple and would only add to the strength of a story.  ____________  Updates:  The Genetic Genealogist mentions the story and argues that Nicholas Wade may not be responsible for the headline. Fair enough &#8212; my criticism is about the entire presentation, whether that be the fault of the author, editor, or other. It does bear noting, however, that Wade<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
