Warren Buffett, Jimmy Buffett, and 23andMe Continued
Earlier today I wrote about how 23andMe used genetic genealogy to confirm that Warren Buffett and Jimmy Buffett are not recently related via their Y chromosome. I also mentioned that this was a great way to introduce the company (as well as genetic genealogy) to the masses.
This evening I saw a story posted at The Motley Fool entitled “Warren Buffett is No Parrothead.” Similar to the story that I linked to this morning, it appears that the author is not familiar with genetic genealogy:
“However, solving the Buffett mystery illustrates how a stake in 23andMe is a good fit in Google’s portfolio. The one thing that blows me away here is that a simple spit test was enough to uproot a family tree deep enough to find an ancestral link before surnames were even around.
“I’m not naive enough to think that 23andMe’s elaborate tests can ever be cheap enough to create a deep genealogical database loaded with data of anyone within spitting distance. However, it would certainly be cool if this was the start of a genealogical social networking hub — a Zillow for the family tree scrapbooking set.”
The author probably doesn’t know that lots of other companies have offered these elaborate tests (see Sidebar), and thousands of customers have entered their results into large databases (Ysearch, mitosearch, etc…). With the amount I’ve spend on genetic genealogy, a $1000 genomic sequencing doesn’t really seem very high. That isn’t the current price of course, but numerous scientists have made it their goal (see my recent series entitled “You and the $1000 Genome”).
So, it appears that 23andMe has successfully introduced yet another person to the wonderful world of genetic genealogy! By the way, I emailed this post to the author of the article in case he might be interested in joining the conversation here at the Genetic Genealogist.
November 19th, 2007 at 5:56 pm
Google connection and Esther Dyson on the board) and Navigenics (with Kleiner Perkins and MDV as blue chip VCs in a $25m round) are the two best known west coast players. 23andme has already found out thatWarren and Jimmy Buffet are not relatedand you can go to their site and sign up for their service for under $1,000. (And learn lots more about it in this Wired article) But they’re not alone. In Boston, Knome is gearing up for something similar and Icelandic company DeCODE genetics, which
November 17th, 2007 at 3:03 pm
[...] list. There is also an entire section which asks “Are Warren and Jimmy Buffett Related?†(I blogged about this interesting analysis back in May of this [...]
November 23rd, 2007 at 11:09 pm
[...] ancient ancestors. (Check out postings on this from Blaine Bettinger’s thegeneticgeneaologist at http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2007/05/30/warren-buffet-jimmy-buffet-and-23andme-continued/)Celebrities and near celebrities are the new frontier in the increasingly competitive world [...]
February 20th, 2008 at 5:07 pm
[...] North. http://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowUserReviews-g147296-d15010... [Found on Yahoo! Search] 9. Warren Buffett, Jimmy Buffett, and 23andMe Continued " The Genetic Genealogist Earlier today I wrote about how 23andMe used genetic genealogy to confirm that Warren Buffett and [...]
March 11th, 2008 at 8:09 am
[...] VCs in a $25m round) are the two best known west coast players. 23andme has already found out that Warren and Jimmy Buffet are not related and you can go to their site and sign up for their service for under $1,000. (And learn lots more [...]
November 11th, 2008 at 8:18 pm
[...] the right and computer shar… http://www.gold-eagle.com/editorials_00/mcintosh012500.html 3. Warren Buffett, Jimmy Buffett, and 23andMe Continued » The Genetic … Earlier today I wrote about how 23andMe used genetic genealogy to confirm that … [...]
January 8th, 2009 at 11:23 am
[...] jimmy buffet warren buffet Top Web Results (1 – 5 of 19) Warren Buffett, Jimmy Buffett, and … 23andme has already found out that Warren and Jimmy Buffet are not related and you can go to their [...]
July 1st, 2010 at 3:50 pm
[...] has been weak, despite major price cuts, psuedo celebrity tie-ins and blimp-based advertising. Andrew Pollack covered this hyped yet [...]