<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Genetic Genealogy Reporting by Non-Scientists &#8211; Be Cautious!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2007/04/18/genetic-genealogy-reporting-by-non-scientists-be-cautious/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2007/04/18/genetic-genealogy-reporting-by-non-scientists-be-cautious/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=genetic-genealogy-reporting-by-non-scientists-be-cautious</link>
	<description>Adding DNA to the Genealogist&#039;s Toolbox</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 06:30:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: oprah winfrey geneologist - Dogpile Web Search</title>
		<link>http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2007/04/18/genetic-genealogy-reporting-by-non-scientists-be-cautious/comment-page-1/#comment-2183</link>
		<dc:creator>oprah winfrey geneologist - Dogpile Web Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 17:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2007/04/18/genetic-genealogy-reporting-by-non-scientists-be-cautious/#comment-2183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] &amp; Low rates     Sponsored by:   findyourfolk.com/   &amp;#149 Found on Ads by Google     Genetic Genealogy Reporting by Non-Scientists - Be Cautious! &#187; The ...   Apr 18, 2007 ... Â“What does it mean, for example, for Oprah Winfrey to announce Â“I am a ... The [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] &amp; Low rates     Sponsored by:   findyourfolk.com/   &amp;#149 Found on Ads by Google     Genetic Genealogy Reporting by Non-Scientists &#8211; Be Cautious! &#187; The &#8230;   Apr 18, 2007 &#8230; Â“What does it mean, for example, for Oprah Winfrey to announce Â“I am a &#8230; The [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StumbleUpon &#187; Your page is now on StumbleUpon!</title>
		<link>http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2007/04/18/genetic-genealogy-reporting-by-non-scientists-be-cautious/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>StumbleUpon &#187; Your page is now on StumbleUpon!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 17:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2007/04/18/genetic-genealogy-reporting-by-non-scientists-be-cautious/#comment-81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Your page is on StumbleUpon [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Your page is on StumbleUpon [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan</title>
		<link>http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2007/04/18/genetic-genealogy-reporting-by-non-scientists-be-cautious/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2007/04/18/genetic-genealogy-reporting-by-non-scientists-be-cautious/#comment-27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I blogged about this topic maybe half a dozen times as well -- just dissecting articles with misinformation. In fact, I even took to rating them!  

It&#039;s sort of a blameless crime. The folks who write these pieces don&#039;t have sufficient time to research and write them, so they almost inevitably wind up with some inaccuracies, but the biggest problem is that they generally leave the overall impression that there&#039;s a one-size-fits-all test out there because they don&#039;t have the word-allowance to tackle the nuances.

One minor correction, though. Oprah actually did make her Zulu claim based on DNA testing, although she never publicly revealed which lab tested her. Then she was re-tested for African American Lives and received a more accurate assessment of her mtDNA line.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I blogged about this topic maybe half a dozen times as well &#8212; just dissecting articles with misinformation. In fact, I even took to rating them!  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s sort of a blameless crime. The folks who write these pieces don&#8217;t have sufficient time to research and write them, so they almost inevitably wind up with some inaccuracies, but the biggest problem is that they generally leave the overall impression that there&#8217;s a one-size-fits-all test out there because they don&#8217;t have the word-allowance to tackle the nuances.</p>
<p>One minor correction, though. Oprah actually did make her Zulu claim based on DNA testing, although she never publicly revealed which lab tested her. Then she was re-tested for African American Lives and received a more accurate assessment of her mtDNA line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
